International Journal of Human Rights Law Review

International Open Access Double Blind Peer Reviewed, Referred Journal

ISSN No. : 2583-7095

A Critical Analysis of Article 44 of the Indian Constitution: Uniform Civil Code (UCC)

📄 Download Full PDF

Cite this Article

Ojus Tripathi & Dr. Sheeba Khalid (2026). A Critical Analysis of Article 44 of the Indian Constitution: Uniform Civil Code (UCC). International Journal of Human Rights Law Review, Volume 5(Issue 1). Retrieved from https://humanrightlawreview.in/journal/a-critical-analysis-of-article-44-of-the-indian-constitution-uniform-civil-code-ucc/

Abstract

Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, included in Part IV on Directive Principles of State Policy, declares that “The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.” This apparently simple provision conceals a dense and contested terrain involving secularism, religious freedom, gender justice, and minority rights, because civil laws governing marriage, divorce, inheritance, guardianship, and adoption have historically been organised along religious lines through Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Parsi and customary regimes. This paper offers a critical analysis of Article 44 and the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) project by combining doctrinal examination of constitutional provisions and Supreme Court jurisprudence with socio legal engagement with policy debates and recent legislative developments such as the Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code, 2024. The methodology is mixed: doctrinal research scrutinises the text and structure of Articles 14, 15, 21, 25–28, 29–30, 37 and 44, alongside leading judgments in Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India, John Vallamattom v. Union of India, Shayara Bano v. Union of India and related cases, while non doctrinal analysis examines scholarly writings, Law Commission materials and commentaries on the UCC debate. The findings reveal that Article 44 has functioned less as a legally enforced duty and more as an intellectual and persuasive resource for courts, lawmakers and activists, cited to support gender just reform, national integration, and occasionally majoritarian homogenisation. The paper argues that a constitutionally faithful reading of Article 44 requires interpreting “uniform” not as rigid sameness but as minimum rights based standards that all personal laws must satisfy, combined with experimental, consultative models like the Uttarakhand UCC that attempt to balance equality with pluralism. The conclusion advises a gradual, pluralist, and gender focused implementation plan rather than a sudden, monolithic national code.

Journal Information

International Journal of Human Rights Law Review
ISSN No.
2583-7095
Submit Manuscript
Licensing
All research articles published in The International Journal of Human Rights Law Review are fully open-access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download, and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJHRLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJHRLR.

Article Analytics

10
Page Views
1
Downloads